Your TMA Officers and Board of Directors
Support the TMA! ~ Traditional Muzzleloaders ~ The TMA is here for YOU!
*** JOIN in on the TMA 2024 POSTAL MATCH *** it's FREE for ALL !

For TMA related products, please check out the new TMA Store !

The Flintlock Paper

*** Folk Firearms Collective Videos ***



Author Topic: powder type volume load comparisons  (Read 416 times)

Online RobD

  • TMA Admin
  • ****
  • Posts: 3538
  • TMA President & Contributing Member
  • Location: NJ
powder type volume load comparisons
« on: July 04, 2013, 08:29:07 AM »
huh?   8)

what are good comparative volume loads for 2fg and 3fg?  iow, if the min/max load range for a .45 flintlock rifle is 45-80 grains of 2fg, what would the comparative load range for using 3fg?  

my current .45 flint rifles likes nearly 70 grains of go-ex 2fg, while the .50 likes just under 80 grains.  what would be a good starting point for using 3fg instead of 2fg for both of those rifles?  i'd like to do some testing to see how well 3fg works for both down the tube and in the pan.
 
tia!

Online Bigsmoke

  • TMA Contributing Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4139
  • TMA: Charter Member #150
Re: powder type volume load comparisons
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2013, 10:50:10 AM »
I think 10% is the number.  In other words, back off the volume by 10% when going to Fffg.
But the real answer is to bench the rifle and do a load development series of shots.  Start at 45 grains of Fffg and shoot 3 shot groups and see what develops.  Next group of three shots, increase the load by 5 grains.  Repeat as necessary.
Time spent with your rifle is always time well used.
John
Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest Up to God.

BigSmoke - John Shorb
TMA Charter Member #150  
NRA - Life
Coeur d'Alene Muzzleloaders - Life

Online RobD

  • TMA Admin
  • ****
  • Posts: 3538
  • TMA President & Contributing Member
  • Location: NJ
Re: powder type volume load comparisons
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2013, 11:19:29 AM »
yes, i already know how to work up a load, just wasn't sure about the comparative loads of 2fg and 3fg.  10% less sounds good, thanx john!

Offline Roaddog

  • TMA Forum Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1580
  • TMA Member: TMA Paid Member # 247 Expires 3/15 / 2019
Re: powder type volume load comparisons
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2013, 06:22:53 AM »
My 45 flint likes 70gr. of FFF And 80 in FF. She will put them on poa if I do my part.
Minnesota TMA State Representative

Member #247

Online RobD

  • TMA Admin
  • ****
  • Posts: 3538
  • TMA President & Contributing Member
  • Location: NJ
Re: powder type volume load comparisons
« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2013, 06:26:08 AM »
how 'bout you folks with 50's?  what's yer 3fg load that works best?

Offline sse

  • TMA Contributing Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5370
  • TMA Founder
  • TMA: TMA Co-Founder, Charter Member, BoD.
  • TMA Member: Charter Member #3
Re: powder type volume load comparisons
« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2013, 10:25:04 AM »
If I ever start shooting the pistol, may have to pick up some Fffg to see how it works...meantime, strictly Ffg...
Regards, sse

************
Consider joining the TMA...If you're not a member, you're missing out...

TMA Member #3
Exp. July A.D. 1821


Offline gunmaker

  • TMA Forum Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 420
  • TMA Member: 715
Re: powder type volume load comparisons
« Reply #6 on: July 05, 2013, 11:38:17 AM »
What bigsmoke said,  I shoot 65 gr. of 3f in my .45 long rifle .015 patch .445 ball.  Will shoot into a quarter & 25 paces (from a rest) it shoots way better than me these days. --- And is a vicious deer killer.  45 gr. 3f on trail walks seems to do it for me as well.  Play with her, she'll talk to you.    ....Tom
Member#2184, 11-1-'12