Traditional Muzzleloading Association
Traditional Firearms => Flintlock Long Guns => Topic started by: Ohio Joe on November 23, 2008, 07:00:31 PM
-
Here are some shooting videos from Northwest Museum that I thought you may enjoy;
http://www.youtube.com/user/NorthwestMuseum (http://www.youtube.com/user/NorthwestMuseum)
-
With all of the videos of people doing it wrong, it's nice to see that someone is doing it right.
-
With all of the videos of people doing it wrong, it's nice to see that someone is doing it right.
Amen to that Roaring Bull!
-
With all of the videos of people doing it wrong, it's nice to see that someone is doing it right.
Amen to that Roaring Bull! 
Folks, In case you didn't know who that fella is, that's our very own Pete Sherran , a member from Cheney, Washington.
Good job Pete!!
Uncle Russ...
-
cool!!
-
He's doing two things I haven't got the stones to try.
1. No ear protection.
2. No eye protection.
I can hear it coming........... "What's the big deal? Nothing happened."
That time. It only takes once for blind, and deaf is cumulative. Not a good thing to teach the young'uns.
Three Hawks.
-
With all of the videos of people doing it wrong, it's nice to see that someone is doing it right.
Amen to that Roaring Bull! :bl th up
Three Hawks, you do bring up a good point.
-
Fwiw.....
Re hearing and eye protection... I don't. I have been shooting and hunting since I was 17, I am now 70. Granted, shooting a 300 Win mag at a range one would certainly wish to use some ear protection, especially if the shooting was done under a covered firing line. That said...with muzzleloading I feel it is up to the individual. Never yet have I seen or heard of anyone who was hunting wearing any ear protection, nor eye protection while hunting. While at a range, I believe it is optional. Can something happen...I suppose.....one can get hit with a car crossing a street...but people do it every day. I truly fail to see the need for all this "safety" stuff. If someone wishes to wear it...fine. The main reason why and how all this got started, imo, was the insurance angle. Period. For all the years folks have been using muzzleloaders...hunting, shooting matches...you name it...from the time this country was settled....they never has hearing protection..eye protection...I guess there might have been some that did...but overall....I doubt it. Seems to me...most if not all of this safety stuff originated because of people like Nader and his kind.
Just my two cents.....
-
oomcurt,.... :)
-
As for me, I will continue to wear hearing and eye protection while shooting and hunting.
But, I agree - hearing protection and eye protection should be optional, just like helmets and seatbelts.
If adults want to lose their sight and hearing and ... lives for that matter, they should be allowed to. I mean, we don't prevent people like Eval Kneival and these bungee divers and other extreme sport folks from doing what they do - taking your life in your hand should be a personal choice.
I just hope my tax dollars don't help pay for the surgeries and hearing aids and so forth when things don't go all the way.
Then there's always the 'benefit' of the "Darwin Award" effect: http://www.darwinawards.com/ (http://www.darwinawards.com/)
-
pete is a good man and knows his stuff .
i dont wear ear plugs eather or for that mater goggles when i shoot my muzzleloaders . now my centerfires yes . .
if im target shooting . but muzzleloaders , no
2 thumbs up from me Pete
-
Pete, can also "MAKE MEAT" here is this years "take" The "long Gun" is A BAKER, he made. .69 cal Musket Bore.
[albumimg:aqsxzfz4]3489[/albumimg:aqsxzfz4]
Puffer
-
I wear ear protection when I target shoot. and if I remember I wear eye protection. But I do not wear them while hunting.
-
Huh? I didn't hear ya. High frequency hearing loss due to, too many ka-booms, and thats the truth!
-
Huh? I didn't hear ya. High frequency hearing loss due to, too many ka-booms, and thats the truth!
DITTO
In "my day" ear protection was not the norm ( US Army, LEO etc.) In fact I remember sticking "cig butts in my ears, when they started "hurting"
Puffer
-
8)
-
He's doing two things I haven't got the stones to try.
1. No ear protection.
2. No eye protection.
I can hear it coming........... "What's the big deal? Nothing happened."
That time. It only takes once for blind, and deaf is cumulative. Not a good thing to teach the young'uns.
Three Hawks.
When we have our monthly kids shoots, no person whether adult or child is allowed to touch a weapon without both firmly in place. I use them target shooting and hunting.
-
As I mentioned, I was an LEO. I must have fired 1,00s of .357 rnds with out ears. I can still remember the "Pain", Even after ears became available, many of us still "practiced" on a regular basis, without, ( so as to be use to the "crack" & not "pull off. on the 2nd shot.)
IMHO, the GREATEST thing out there are the "in ear electronics". esp if your "modern hunting rifle has a muzzel brake")
Puffer
-
I've noticed that some folks today have started down the "slippery slope" of imposing ever increasing rules upon others enjoying the fun hobby of traditional muzzleloading.
MHO is,... that the wearing of ear (and eye) protection, should be one of "PERSONAL CHOICE", and not something thats forced upon folks enjoying an activity thats been in existance for over 200 years.
There is quite a difference between shooting modern smokeless "MAGNUM" handguns (and rifles), when compared to the relatively "soft spoken" traditional muzzleloaders shooting blackpowder. This is very evident by the lack of recoil from muzzleloaders when compared to simular caliburs of smokeless centerfire guns.
If, I ever go to a "blackpowder shoot" and someone DEMANDS that I must wear ear (and eye) "protection" before I can participate,... I'm gettin right back on my horse, and riding someplace where FREEDOM of choice is still the "rule". :rt th
This is my personal opinion ONLY,... but, I completely fail to understand "HOW" my NOT wearing ear and eye protection, effects ANYONE'S eyes and ears but "mine", and if I wasn't comfortable without it, I'd darn sure wear it.
-
If, I ever go to a "blackpowder shoot" and someone DEMANDS that I must wear ear (and eye) "protection" before I can participate,... I'm gettin right back on my horse, and riding someplace where FREEDOM of choice is still the "rule". :!:
Puffer
-
well less see my hearing loss comes from the whine of a UH1.
today you also lose hearing from the radio in you car . wind blowing in your hair while on that bike
you name it , its there .
try thinking about all those medium sounds you here all day long , constantly .
-
Captchee, here is the next generation Huey.
(http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm282/RoaringBull_photos/huey.jpg)
I work for Bell Helicopter.
-
ahhhh a super Mike . ya now your talkin
-
ahhhh a super Mike . ya now your talkin :rofl
Puffer
-
Therein lies the "beauty" of attending AMM events, which are held on private and public ground, (I've never seen any AMM "events" held at a "club" range), so no "hoops" for us to jump thru.
I was the OTL, MD, and CC at my monthly shoots in Alaska, and we had "zero" problems,... and some of the participants drove over 200 miles each month to come and shoot.
Anyone participating in a shoot held on "club" grounds, and under the "umbrella" of NMLRA, or NRA, insurance,.... will have to jump thru their hoops in order to be covered.
That's not for me, there's too many other places to "play".
-
8)
-
I've got no problem if folks choose to wear ear and eye protection, that's there business. I personally don't use it and that's my business.
My son uses it because I tell him he has to, and while he's a minor under my roof he'll do as I say when it comes to protecting his hearing and eyesight when shooting. When he's an adult he can make up his own mind on the subject.
If I go to a shoot where it's required to wear ear & eye protection, I'll go back to my vehicle and get it and wear it, and enjoy the day.
If I go to a shoot where ear & eye protection is not allowed, I'll leave, even if I don't use it myself. I figure if it's a safety issue under question and folks want nothing to do with it, I have to wonder who's standing behind me with a loaded rifle primed and cocked waiting to get to the line to shoot simply because other safety issues have been pushed aside.
All I can say is make your own judgement calls and hope it's the right one.
-
I've got no problem if folks choose to wear ear and eye protection, that's there business. I personally don't use it and that's my business.
My son uses it because I tell him he has to, and while he's a minor under my roof he'll do as I say when it comes to protecting his hearing and eyesight when shooting. When he's an adult he can make up his own mind on the subject.
If I go to a shoot where it's required to wear ear & eye protection, I'll go back to my vehicle and get it and wear it, and enjoy the day.
If I go to a shoot where ear & eye protection is not allowed, I'll leave, even if I don't use it myself. I figure if it's a safety issue under question and folks want nothing to do with it, I have to wonder who's standing behind me with a loaded rifle primed and cocked waiting to get to the line to shoot simply because other safety issues have been pushed aside.
All I can say is make your own judgement calls and hope it's the right one.
Puffer
-
Here is a story.
As I mentioned before, 2 yr.s ago, I was CRSO for PPR. (eyes & ears req.)
I was positioned about 30 yd.s away from position 1 on the trail walk, when I saw a man & 4 youth approaching the position. I could not see any "eyes" on anyone, so I started to move in. But I soon found out that I did not have to say anything. WHY"
I had not taken more than a couple of steps, when I saw one of the shooters ( an "OLD TIMER") approach the group. I did not hear what he said, but the "adult", with a "raised' voice" basically told the "OLD TIMER" to "stuff It."
The next thing I heard was a Cease Fire & Dry them Up, from the Line. As I got to the "group, I was joined by 4 other shooters (also "old timers") & told that they would handle it. They then gave him the option to either get eyes & ears or forgetting about shooting "THEIR" range.
I was told, "Puffer, you may be the "official RSO" but Range Safety is all of our' responsibility. We may not personally agree with the "eyes & ears" for us adults, but thems the rules PLUS the youth NEED them.
Puffer
-
Such an "incident" wouldn't have even taken place a mere decade ago. I don't know whats changed, I don't know a single person (young or old) walking around "deaf and blind" from shooting traditional muzzleloaders over the years.
I suspect it's mostly a matter of "liability" for some of the ranges, but with all the blackpowder shoots I've participated in over many many years, NONE have ever required "eyes and ears", nor did they forbid them.
Like I said in my first post, I think such a (mandatory) requirement is heading down a "slippery slope", and just takes us another small step away from really true "traditional" muzzleloading.
Modern high power centerfires are a different story, and I agree with such a requirement when on a crowded range with them.
-
Imho...what has changed is the mindset of people today, especially the younger ones. All one hears today, be it regarding seat belts, smoking, whatever....is "safety". In short...we have turned into a nation of a combination or health and safety freaks. Really. I've been around for a long long time..and I have done things/had jobs where some things just "came with the territory". Did anyone get their nose out of joint because of that? Hell no. If one thinks about it...look at where this "noise" today is really coming from. Activists of one kind or another...plain and simple. Look at the ads in magazines and tv...the majority of them are concerning some type of health aid or cosmetic. If not that...they are telling one to "buy this", "you need that", etc. Then we have this wacky thing where some damm pharmaceutical is advertised where one should "see their doctor to see if they need it"! Of all the damm stupid things...sheesh. I could go on and on...but today for the most part people are lemmings, one dives into the sea and hordes follow that one. People have in my opinion forgotten to be independant. They have forgotten to in most cases think. So....others have gotten this hairbrained idea that they must tell these lemmings how to live.
Ok, I'm over my rant.....
-
Back to the original post.........
Boy those sure are some informative videos, aren't they???
-
Here is a story.
As I mentioned before, 2 yr.s ago, I was CRSO for PPR. (eyes & ears req.)
I was positioned about 30 yd.s away from position 1 on the trail walk, when I saw a man & 4 youth approaching the position. I could not see any "eyes" on anyone, so I started to move in. But I soon found out that I did not have to say anything. WHY"
I had not taken more than a couple of steps, when I saw one of the shooters ( an "OLD TIMER") approach the group. I did not hear what he said, but the "adult", with a "raised' voice" basically told the "OLD TIMER" to "stuff It."
The next thing I heard was a Cease Fire & Dry them Up, from the Line. As I got to the "group, I was joined by 4 other shooters (also "old timers") & told that they would handle it. They then gave him the option to either get eyes & ears or forgetting about shooting "THEIR" range.
I was told, "Puffer, you may be the "official RSO" but Range Safety is all of our' responsibility. We may not personally agree with the "eyes & ears" for us adults, but thems the rules PLUS the youth NEED them.
Puffer
"If you see a man approaching you with the obvious intent of doing you good, you should run for your life." Henry David Thoreau