Thanks Sr51!
The Rifle Shoppe, Inc. - Russian ArmsI noticed that the above link provides mostly parts, and part numbers, with costs.
Having little to no interest in Russian made Muzzleloaders previously, I never gave the matter much thought.
However, the following statements kinda caught me off guard....guess I wasn't expecting this at all, so now my interest has peaked quite a bit......
1843 Russian Luttich Carbine"This is the first regulation percussion Rifle used in the Russian Army. It is an almost exact copy of the British Brunswick. This is the first model with the 3 leaf rear sight. These shot a pointed bullet with projection on the sides to fit in the two groove .70 caliber barrel. One of the longest shots in the history of muzzle loading arms was fired from one of these rifles. These were made in Liege for the Russian Army. The length of the barrel is 30 3/16". The lock plate is marked “J. Malharre A Liege.”.
"
1845 Russian Musket
The Russian’s copied the French 1842 almost exactly, except all the mountings are in brass. The stocks will have a raised cheek piece instead of the cutout of the French. The barrel is 42 3/4" long in .71 caliber. In 1854 many of the M1845’s were sent into the arsenals to be rifled and fitted with the 1843 Luttich carbine sight.(My emphasis with the underline and bold print.)
From reading this, one would think Russia depended mostly on the rest of Europe, ie, Belgium, Germany, Brittan, or Western Europe in general, to proved the arms they were using during this time frame.
This could be because of the poor economics in Russia for a hundred or so years following the introduction of both the flintlock and later on the Percussion......
Someone more versed than myself should comment on the subject as my own comments are noting more than conjecture / speculation on my part.
It just doesn't seem right that a world power would go through a couple hundred of years without their own Arms Manufacturing / Development, and then suddenly become recognized as a Super Power sixty years later.
Sir Michael may have some views on this, if he stops by, but from my really limited research I don't particularly care for what I'm finding....it's gotta be a lot deeper than what I have been reading.
Good question, good subject!
Uncle Russ......