Having done all my shooting outside, I never really considered the ill effects of shooting lowly P*x.
I had always been of the opinion that it was less powerful, volume for volume. Was I ever surprised to do some chronograph work with the stuff maybe 18 or 20 years ago in my big bore rifles. I was testing GOEX vs P*x. In my .62 rifle, 200 grains of GOEX gave me 1,980 fps IIRC. 200 grains of P*x got me about 1,990 fps and 200 grains of P*x Select broke the 2,000 fps barrier, just barely. The problem was there was always a slight hangfire. Must have been the cyanide burning off?
I don't recall doing any testing on my .72 caliber, but I am sure I did, just don't recall the specifics.
Testing the 8 bore rifle really brought it home. With 300 grains of Fg, I got 1,425. Upping things to 300 grains of Ffg pumped it up to 1,525, and when I tried it with the Select, the ball scooted out the barrel at around 1,630 fps. And again, there was that darned slight hangfire. I tried P*x in a few other rifles that I had hanging around and consistently got a hangfire with it. All the rifles were equipped with musket nipples and used RWS musket caps.
Bottom line is I don't care to experience hangfires so I gave what was left in the container away to someone and haven't looked back since. Who knew I was safeguarding my health accidently.
Also, as I recall, I called up Chris Hodgdon one day and asked him why his powder was giving me better performance than black powder and he replied that I am the big bore specialist, and I should know. Not a lot of help there. Oh well.
Bigsmoke (now you know how I got my name - it sure wasn't from shooting 30 grains of Fffg in a .32 caliber)