Anybody here ever been told not to shoot their Charleville in a "Trade Gun" match?
I'm asking on behalf of a friend of mine who was recently discouraged from entering on the basis that "it's not a Trade Gun", i.e.: it's not a gun that was made for trade.
I looked through the NMLRA rules and found these two entries:
5650–TRADE GUN or FOWLER (a.k.a. SMOOTHBORE)–A traditional offhand hunting firearm originally intended to shoot either round ball or shot. Flintlock only. No set triggers. 28ga. (54 caliber) minimum. No rear sight above the plane of the barrel.
9050–SMOOTHBORE–A traditional style long gun originally intended to shoot either round ball or shot. The smoothbore must be of 28 ga. (.54 caliber) or larger. No rear sight above the plane of the barrel, no set triggers. Smoothbores that are acceptable in the primitive smoothbore matches include musket, fowler and trade gun.
Really, I'm asking out of curiosity more than anything else. I've always known the determining factor for a smoothbore match to be 1) no rifling and 2) no rear sight. In a match context, always before heard "Trade Gun" used generally synonymously with "Smoothbore"; never heard of it being used to limit the category of smoothbore to a specific historical weapon/period before.
Does make me wonder if I would have been asked to not enter my fowling piece?
Looking forward to everybody's take on this. Thanks in advance!