All this talk about the noise of a gun blast and the speed of sound has got me thinkin.
I always noticed that a subsonic 22 LR shot in a long barrel rifle is quieter than a supersonic 22 LR shot in the same rifle short barrel. And a supersonic 22 LR shot in a pistol/revolver seems a lot louder than when shot from a long barrel rifle.
The difference between the subsonic and supersonic in the rifle is what (I think) is being discussed here. The subsonic doesn't break the sound barrier so the only sound is from the very rapidly burning propellant and the resulting gases being expelled from the barrel. The supersonic adds in the sound of the bullet breaking the sound barrier, that is, the "crack".
But, why does the 22 LR in a handgun seem louder? The bullet is probably going slower due to the short barrel. If it doesn't make supersonic, the sound would be less. If it does make supersonic, it would seem the sound we be about the same. Only, thing I can guess is the increased volume is due to the gases still moving fast when it reaches the end of the short barrel, possible even still burning (more muzzle flash) and that adds to the sound.
Now I have a homework assignment for all you muzzle stuffers.
Get a chronograph and decibel meter (there's probably an app for your smart phone), take 'em to the range and take a bunch of shots varying the amount of powder. Vary the powder enough to get shots both above and below supersonic. Report back and tell us the powder amount, speeds and decibels and maybe how accurate the shots were.
Go ahead, do that! You were looking for an excuse to make smoke anyway