Welcome to the TMA - the Traditional Muzzleloading Association

The TMA is always free to access: totally non-profit and therefore no nagging for your money, no sponsors means no endless array of ads to wade through, and no "membership fees" ever required. Brought to you by traditional muzzleloaders with decades of wisdom in weaponry, accoutrements, and along with 18th and 19th century history knowledge of those times during the birth our nation, the United States of America.

!!! PLEASE CLICK HERE TO READ AN IMPORTANT TMA MESSAGE !!!

Author Topic: Practical Comparison of Goex, KIK, and Elephant Powders.  (Read 3891 times)

Offline Uncle Russ

  • TMA Contributing Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7345
  • Total likes: 77
  • TMA Founder. Walk softly & carry a big Smoothbore!
  • TMA Member: Founder / Charter Member #004
  • Location: Columbia Basin, Washington State
Practical Comparison of Goex, KIK, and Elephant Powders.
« on: March 09, 2009, 04:50:01 AM »
There seems to always be the question of, "What is the best powder for my new Riflegun???"
 
Here is a Practical comparison of the three most popular powders done by 4 unbiased individuals....you decide which might be the best for you.

http://www.norwestcompany.com/comparison.htm

Uncle Russ...
It's the many things we don't do that totally sets us apart.
TMA Co-Founder / Charter Member# 4

Offline Ohio Joe

  • TMA BoD
  • ****
  • Posts: 7637
  • Total likes: 306
  • TMA Founder / Charter Member# 8
  • TMA Member: Founder
  • Location: Nebraska
(No subject)
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2009, 06:54:35 AM »
I've seen these charts before Russ, they are interesting.  Each powder at one time or another had its advantages.  Though the Elephant (to my knowledge) is no longer made.   I did use some of
the Elephant powder when winning a can here and there at Rondy's and shoots, the 3fg wasn't bad.

I still know a few folks who have some Elephant powder they are still using.  They must have bought a ton of the stuff?

I've often thought of giving the KiK a try, but then I ask myself if I want to work up new loads to re'zero all my rifles because of the higher burn rate over Goex.  The answer is usually that I'll just stick
with the Goex.

It would be nice to see how the Graf Powder stacks up.  I wonder if anyone out there has any numbers on it?
Chadron Fur Trade Days Rendezvous / "Ol' Candle Snuffer"
"Museum of the Fur Trade" Chadron, Nebraska

Offline Gordon H.Kemp

(No subject)
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2009, 03:05:28 PM »
As usual russ has found thought provoking information. I can't add any side light as I've only used Goex. I may have mentioned that I found a full can of DuPont 3f in a thrift /antique store near Parker S. dakota where my youngest daughter lives. He was selling the "can" as a collectable and cared nothing of the contents. For &3.00 I figured i couldn;t go far wrong. I've burned up about half of the can and tried to compare its performance with the 3f Goez I shoot . I would have to say it appears to have a little more oomph for the same loads. I also believe it leaves more residue. One thing it does show is that the shelf life of BP is LoooooNNG. By the way? anyone want the can for a collection??
Gordy
TMA Charter Member #144
Expires 3/14/2013

Offline cb

(No subject)
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2009, 03:12:27 PM »
Quote
The KIK imported by GOEX had some serious accuracy problems.  In my .45 and .50 ml rifles it could not match GOEX or Elephant for accuracy.  It did give a more manageable bore fouling compared to the other two powders.  At that time it was faster than either GOEX or Elephant.  But since that time GOEX has raised their velocity a good bit over their 1999 and 2000 production powders. The KIK in bp cartridge rifles showed accuracy problems.

Unless you can just one can of KIK to test you could be taking a risk in buying any quantity of it.  If you are not willing to take that risk I would suggest sticking with GOEX.

KIK-Kamink in Slovenia is in bankruptcy so how long the KIK will be around is anybody's guess.
per Mad Monk aka Dutch Bill
FWIW - I asked the above on the ALR site and got the quoted answer - MM/DB is an acknowledged expert on BP having been in the business as a chemist for some years....
Chuck Burrows aka Grey Wolf

Offline Uncle Russ

  • TMA Contributing Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7345
  • Total likes: 77
  • TMA Founder. Walk softly & carry a big Smoothbore!
  • TMA Member: Founder / Charter Member #004
  • Location: Columbia Basin, Washington State
(No subject)
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2009, 03:46:13 PM »
Quote
MM/DB is an acknowledged expert on BP having been in the business as a chemist for some years....

I totally agree cb, if anyone will know about Black Powder, it will be Bill Knight.

Bill has studied, and worked with Black Powder more than anyone else here in the U.S.....In fact, he is the "official" Federal Government Consultant in the use and usage of Black Powder.

And, on top of all that, he is just one heck of a nice fella!

I have been reading Mad Monk's writings since I got my first computer, back when "Prodigy" was the server of choice, and shooting material was very limited on the so-called Internet of the time....it's actually kinda sad that I have not been able to retain more of what I've  read during all those years.

Uncle Russ...
It's the many things we don't do that totally sets us apart.
TMA Co-Founder / Charter Member# 4

Offline Gordon H.Kemp

(No subject)
« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2009, 07:18:53 PM »
Somewhere in the archives of past posts we have a long and in depth consultation by Bill Knight . I made a hard copy and if I find it i'll post it here.
Gordy
TMA Charter Member #144
Expires 3/14/2013

Offline Voyageur

(No subject)
« Reply #6 on: March 09, 2009, 07:30:32 PM »
8)  "Doc"
Artillerymen Do It With A Bang
Artillery the King of Battle
St. Barbara-Pray for us !

NRA Endowment Life

Charter Member #104-10/22/15
"JOIN THE TMA TODAY"

Offline James Kelly

(No subject)
« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2009, 10:39:43 PM »
I like Swiss.
More recoil, which I ass-u-me means higher velocity, than the same charge using my lifetime supply of du Pont.
NullB priming gives faster ignition than does FFFFg du Pont, in my admittedly limited experience with it.
if the ball is not rammed close on the powder. . .frequently cause the barrel to burst

Online Bigsmoke

(No subject)
« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2009, 10:48:07 PM »
It was my opinion that the initial batches of Elephant indeed were the dirtiest of the dirty.  It complete re-defined fouling, that's for sure.
I think it was in 1999 or 2000 they reformulated and were using a lot more graphite and it really cleaned up.  I prefered it for the big bore guns with Fg powder.
KIK, never tried it, don't care to.
Lido, I wouldn't even load it in Beaverthing's rifle.
Swiss is good, but I don't see it for the price difference.
I will stick with GOEX, it's worked for me for 30 some years, don't see any reason to change now.
Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest Up to God.

BigSmoke - John Shorb
TMA Charter Member #150  
NRA - Life
Coeur d'Alene Muzzleloaders - Life

Offline Loyalist Dave

  • TMA Forum Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 687
  • Total likes: 1
  • TMA Member: 800
  • Location: MD
(No subject)
« Reply #9 on: March 30, 2009, 12:13:56 PM »
Yep I hated Elephant for dirty powder.  I was going to point out that GOEX is American, while the others are imports, and no telling what will be banned for import in the future..., but as many of the companies are going belly up it may be a moot point.

LD
It's not what you think you know; it's what you can prove.

Offline Iktomi

Graf powder
« Reply #10 on: April 11, 2009, 11:39:07 AM »
I ordered a couple of pounds of Graf FFFg along with a couple of goex FFg  and have been shooting them side by side for comparison. In my .54 GPR, a 95 grn charge of the goex shoots to the same POI as an 85 grn charge of the graf with same ball/patch combo. I had heard the the graf might be dirtier, but my observation was exactly the opposite. Shooting the goex, at even a lighter charge, I'd get 3 shots before I needed to wipe. At the 95 grain charge, I could load the second shot with difficulty, and have to wipe the bore every other shot. Suprisingly, with the Graf powder in FFFg, I could put together an 8 to 10 shot string before swabbing the bore. MUCH easier loading , and the damp patch would come out with less residue than the goex patch would after only a couple of shots. Plus, it's cheaper. My experience only, YMMV.
TMA member #417, expires 2/14/2010

Offline Mike R

(No subject)
« Reply #11 on: May 14, 2009, 11:08:23 AM »
I started out shooting only the old DuPont powder--which many old timers thought was the standard.  I had to move out of state back when I had a stash of it and I gave it to a buddy rather than worry about shipping it [the movers wouldn't handle it and my vehicles were jammed already]--then I could get no more as DuPont quit making it.  For awhile I could not get GOEX and bought 3 cans of elephant--after a few shots gummed up my rifles so much that they wouldn't fire, I gave that stuff away too.  Been shooting Goex ever since and to be honest I cannot see much difference between it and the old DuPont.  I have not had access to any of rhe popular imports like Swiss, etc...
Ch Mbr#53 ,dues in Feb

Offline Gambia

powder
« Reply #12 on: May 14, 2009, 12:13:21 PM »
There is such a thing as personal preference and it is extremely difficult to get a completely unbiased test of almost anything.There are so many variables in any test of black powder [barrel,patch lube,temperature,humidity,elevation and on it goes any test is only specific to the equipment,material and conditions prevailing at the time of the test.The point of this?Shoot what works for you,never mind the experts or the tests.[I have a bias about experts because as as an Prof. Engineer I have experienced some real fiascos by experts,not to exclude the current financial mess,I am sure the powder expert referenced above is very capable and I am in no way questioning his ability or integrity] However if the powder ball patch lube gun combo does what you want and expect it to do use them.I am by nature inquisitive so I have over time tried about anything that came down the pipe, now and again I found something I liked and used. As to powder, again I have tried most all of them that have been available during the last 60yrs and I have a personal preference mainly due to the fact that my muzzleloaders are dialed in to a specific patch ball powder lube combo that suits me and I am too old and lazy to change.

Offline doulos

(No subject)
« Reply #13 on: May 14, 2009, 12:24:21 PM »
Ive been using some Kik 2F and comparing it to my usual Goex 2F.
Out of 2 of my hawken rifles (A pedersoli.54 and a Custom Stith .58.) I haven't seen any difference in accuracy .  But I have noticed a definite difference in fouling.  Goex produces a much softer fouling allowing me to load much more without cleaning. KIK seems to produce a very hard fouling right at the bottom of the barrel near where the powder was sitting a little higher than loading depth. It might be a very useful hunting powder because of the higher velocity but at the range i like Goex better so far.

Online sse

  • TMA Contributing Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5389
  • Total likes: 27
  • TMA Founder
  • TMA: TMA Co-Founder, Charter Member, BoD.
  • TMA Member: Charter Member #3
(No subject)
« Reply #14 on: May 14, 2009, 01:04:27 PM »
Quote
KIK seems to produce a very hard fouling right at the bottom of the barrel near where the powder was sitting a little higher than loading depth.
I often get the same with GOEX.
Regards, sse

************
Consider joining the TMA...If you're not a member, you're missing out...

TMA Member #3
Exp. October A.D. 1826