Welcome to the TMA - the Traditional Muzzleloading Association

The TMA is always free to access: totally non-profit and therefore no nagging for your money, no sponsors means no endless array of ads to wade through, and no "membership fees" ever required. Brought to you by traditional muzzleloaders with decades of wisdom in weaponry, accoutrements, and along with 18th and 19th century history knowledge of those times during the birth our nation, the United States of America.

!!! PLEASE CLICK HERE TO READ AN IMPORTANT TMA MESSAGE !!!

Author Topic: GPR barrels  (Read 2659 times)

Offline burch

GPR barrels
« on: March 15, 2009, 05:18:42 PM »
Why does Lyman just offer the GPR in the heavy caibers. I wonder why they didn`t make more drop in`s in smaller caibers.  Mine a .50 cal and as much as I like it the dang thing weighs a ton. I was thinking about getting a GM 32 or maybe a 36. The only trouble is with the 15/16 barrel it`ll probably weigh as much as my 50.  I wonder which of the production guns offer the most options for drop in`s ?

               Burch
Member #471 Expires 5/16/09
If I Gotta Explain It You wouldn`t Understand It

Offline Voyageur

(No subject)
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2009, 06:09:33 PM »
I would suppose simple economics would dictate that you make the two most popular bore sizes that are currently in use. While I personally don't feel the GPR is too heavy, I enjoy that comfortable feel of a that mass of gun. Mine is also a .50 and I am seriously thinking of swapping out with a new .54 Lyman barrel. For the type of accuracy that the original gun supplies I do not understand the need of GM replacements. As for smaller bores such as .36 and .32 as "drop-ins---that gun would get considerably heavier especially with the barrel width as it is now. Alas I don't think there is a solution to your problem.  :?  "Doc"
Artillerymen Do It With A Bang
Artillery the King of Battle
St. Barbara-Pray for us !

NRA Endowment Life

Charter Member #104-10/22/15
"JOIN THE TMA TODAY"

Offline Iktomi

(No subject)
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2009, 09:51:33 AM »
For a given barrel profile, such as 15/16 X 32 as on a GPR, the smaller the caliber, the heavier the barrel.
TMA member #417, expires 2/14/2010

Three Hawks

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2009, 01:47:25 PM »
Quote from: "Iktomi"
For a given barrel profile, such as 15/16 X 32 as on a GPR, the smaller the caliber, the heavier the barrel.

Not only that, but incredibly heavier.  Dixie Gun Works catalog has a chart in the back which spells out the weight of octagonal barrels of varying sizes with bores of varying diameters.

If you really want a smaller caliber rifle, drop ins are easily made up.  I have a .40 in my Seneca which requires a 13/16" barrel.  It was .45, but I had that barrel reamed to .50 smooth.   I also have a .45 factory barrel to go into my T-C Hawken which requires a 15/16" barrel.  Years ago I made up a .30 barrel to go into the same gun.  To get the  15/16" .30 barrel to balance, I had to cut it to 24".

Before anyone asks, yes it is a muzzleloading .30 cal. barrel 15/16" across the flats.  Rifled 1 turn in 48", especially for round balls.   I shoot either .285" cast balls, (Boy ws it fun finding that mold!!) or .27" # 4 buckshot.  Either works as well as the other.   12 gr. 3F Goex for both.  With homemade Tap-O-Cap caps it's nearly free shooting and keeps a kid occupied for hours.

Three Hawks

I strongly advise you to get a small caliber rifle with a slim profile barrel.  You will be much happier for many more years.

Offline tg

(No subject)
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2009, 06:14:39 PM »
Most people probably don't care but the type of gun the Lyman historicaly represents was a heavy gun the LGP of today would be a light weight in the 1850's

Offline burch

(No subject)
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2009, 06:50:06 PM »
I wonder how bad i`d screw it up wacking the barrel down to 28"
Member #471 Expires 5/16/09
If I Gotta Explain It You wouldn`t Understand It