Kinda funny how times change...yet somehow remain the same.
Why did this question come about?

FWIW; I was looking through some old paperwork, cleaning out and throwing away "stuff" that had become nothing more than clutter.
I came across a small Steno Notebook that had a lot of notes, going back to the days when the TMA was first formed, and even months before....the very earliest entry in this little book is dated 8/12/2004. (Rondo was to PM Captchee and Silverfox on another forum.)
During those early days, in an effort to promote a deeper study of history within the membership, I came across a little game we played here on the forum back then. The mechanics of how this was to be done was what caught my eye, but I decided, 'what the heck, let's try this one more time, I'll just post the question and folks can answer openly'......
The game was simple enough, each week a question was posted, and all the answers were given by PM, to the then Forum Administrator, whose name was "smoked".
This particular question, "
To whom was the 1st HBC Charter granted?" was asked on 8/23/2005, and after considerable debate, much discussion, and a little hair pulling, it was unanimously decided and agreed on that the answer was indeed Prince Ruppert. (This is what surprised me most when sse answered, 'Canada'...he had seen this same question before.)
Then, a few months later, it was decided this whole thing was a very bad idea, as it created
not the research, reading, and study of history that we had hoped for, but nothing less than dissension and unrest amongst the membership.
It brought out the worst of the PC vs Non-PC crowd, as it was carried over into the other forums.
So the after a few months, the entire forum was deleted and was never started again.
Many of the old timers should remember this very well, as it turned into a bag of worms, that ended right sharply with the deletion of that forum.
So, fast forward about five years and see if things have changed...
Questions posed....
-Do the answers change as the question ages?
-Is there more research available today than there was just five, ten, or fifteen years ago?
-Does one reference carry more weight than the second, or the third reference?
-Does a single mention provide provenance?
-Is it possible that the interpretation of the same identical subject matter varies greatly from person to person when using the same references?
These are the same questions, verbatim, that was addressed back then.
And, the collective response to all these questions at that time was a resounding "Yes".
Which translates into the fact that there will always be disagreement....even when several people are looking at the same question, and getting their references from the same places.
Uncle Russ...