So, what does everyone think of the 40 cal? I know some say it's too big for squirrels, and too small for deer. In Arkansas, it's the only ML rifle caliber that can be used for both.
In some ways, I could see how the 40 could really be a good deal, for someone who got out and took advantage of the squirrel season, and after using it for several days of eairly squirrel hunting, one could become very proficent with said rifle, and therefore be in top form, when the opportunity to take a deer came along in late October.
Of course the .62 fowler, or smooth rifle, could be used more or less in the same way. But there is one advantage to the 40, that I don't see with any other ML choice, and I wonder if that is not why simular calibers were so popular in the old Tenn rifles, etc.
And the one advantage, I see, is that you can be loaded with a ball that can eaisly take a squirrel, rabbit, bobcat, fox, coyote, or even a deer without having to change loads.
What are your thoughts?