Just got some Mo. flints from R. Pierce . I tried one awhile back and it was a real sparker and it just kept on sparking till it was too short to keep iin the jaws! I usually use the black English , and they did well . But I believe thease white Mo. flints are at least as good and possibly BETTER :lol: then the last English flints I just changed out !
Gordy, like you, I was very pleasantly surprised when I first tried Rich's flint a few years back. Since then, they have been the main-stay in my flint box.
What makes one flint better than the other is beyond me, and I have to admit the light colored flints from Rich just somehow didn't look as hard as the black English flint, but performance is indeed the tell-all IMO.
FWIW: I keep a small piece of paper in the patch box of my Penn. Longhunter from Pedersoli, and on it I keep the number of balls fired on that particular flint. After reading your post I pulled that paper out and took a look...seems I have 62 on this flint and it's still sparking good...even dry-fired it three times to even the count out at 65!!
Unfortunately I never did this with any English Flints, when it quit sparking, I just napped a little and kept on trucking until it gave up the ghost.
Although I have never kept an actual record before, other than maybe a quick count of the number of balls shot, I can't really say what my best English flint turned out, although I do remember one especially at about (45 +/- a couple) in my .69 cal and I thought that was pretty doggone good at the time. In fact, I kinda considered that to be more the norm, compared to what I had been getting before.
Is Rich's "creek rock" better than the English??
Can't say for sure, but all indications are kinda leaning that way, at least for me, right now. Don't think they'll ever replace the English Black Flint, but what do I know?
All my life I have read, and heard, stories of folks getting 100 shots and even more from a single flint.
I can assure you that has never happened with any flint I have ever used before, and I have used a few over the years....
Still yet, that "story" is what led me to try keeping a fairly accurate count of my own.
Up until about three years ago, I have always discounted such stories as just another of the "old wives tales" that abound in this hobby....now, I'm starting to re-think this thing on flints.
In view of all this ramblin, I think you have a great subject, and one I personally would like to hear more of.
I have always suspected I never "set" my flint just right in order to get the number of shots I have heard of others getting.
Bevel up, Bevel down, thicker leather, thiner leather, no leather, using a pounded out round-ball to increase cock fall, and on and on the stories go, been there, done that, and if I ever did anything that actually increased flint life I was never astute enough to see it.
I
definitely would like to hear more on this!
In fact, I would like to encourage keeping some kind of record for all us flintlock users, so you'll know fairly close as to what you're actually getting, and
then, let's compare notes.
Uncle Russ...