I just thought of this. Those plastic wanna-be's will probably sky rocket in price since their stock's are petroleum based, as is their poly sabots they claim is so good.
Fact is;
1. If these modern inlines were any good at all, a person wouldn't need one that had the same feel as their .30-06 or .270, and so forth.
2. They wouldn't need a specialized type bullet to be accurate in the inliner's eyes. Accuracy for a modern Inline seems to be a 12" group at 100 yards apparently??? At least that's all I've ever seen anyone shoot with one when the person(s) using them can actually hit the paper more then once out of three shots. Heck, they can't even out shoot an unsighted smoothbore musket.
3. They wouldn't need a scope if they were any good for accuracy.
4. They wouldn't need a scope and smokeless powder if they were any good for accuracy.
5. They wouldn't need tons of advertising if they were any good for accuracy as they'd speak for themself through performance. Which is non-existant!
Bottom line; Modern inline muzzleloading rifles are pure BS... Manufactures would be better advised to stick with what works and have been proven to work for well over hundreds of years when it comes to muzzleloaders. The good ol' traditional style muzzleloading rifle shooting the good ol' traditional round ball.
Hopefully Lyman won't fold up with their Great Plains Rifle.
I'm sure it's to late for TC.